2012/12/27 Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org>: > So just submit a patch to the tracker... > > --Guido > > > On Thursday, December 27, 2012, Sven Brauch wrote: >> >> 2012/12/27 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com>: >> > It certainly sounds like its worth considering for 3.4. It's a new >> > feature, though, so it unfortunately wouldn't be possible to backport >> > it to any earlier releases. >> >> Yes, that is understandable. It wouldn't be much of a problem tough, >> my whole project is pretty bleeding-edge anyways, and depending on >> python >= 3.4 wouldn't hurt. For me it would only be important to have >> an acceptable solution for this long-term. >> >> Greetings, >> Sven >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> Unsubscribe: >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
I submitted a patch to the tracker, see http://bugs.python.org/issue16795. The patch only contains the very minimum set of changes which are necessary. There's still a few things you'll need to work around when writing a static language analyzer, but none of them is too much work, so I didn't include them for now in order to keep things compact. Thanks and best regards, Sven _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
