2012/12/27 Sven Brauch <svenbra...@googlemail.com>: > 2012/12/27 Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org>: >> So just submit a patch to the tracker... >> >> --Guido >> >> >> On Thursday, December 27, 2012, Sven Brauch wrote: >>> >>> 2012/12/27 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com>: >>> > It certainly sounds like its worth considering for 3.4. It's a new >>> > feature, though, so it unfortunately wouldn't be possible to backport >>> > it to any earlier releases. >>> >>> Yes, that is understandable. It wouldn't be much of a problem tough, >>> my whole project is pretty bleeding-edge anyways, and depending on >>> python >= 3.4 wouldn't hurt. For me it would only be important to have >>> an acceptable solution for this long-term. >>> >>> Greetings, >>> Sven >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Python-Dev mailing list >>> Python-Dev@python.org >>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >>> Unsubscribe: >>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org >> >> >> >> -- >> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) > > I submitted a patch to the tracker, see http://bugs.python.org/issue16795. > The patch only contains the very minimum set of changes which are > necessary. There's still a few things you'll need to work around when > writing a static language analyzer, but none of them is too much work, > so I didn't include them for now in order to keep things compact. > > Thanks and best regards, > Sven
Ping! Nobody complained since I proposed the patch a week ago, just some people added themselves to the notify list. What do you think? Cheers, Sven _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
