On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:33 PM, MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: > > On 2013-02-13 13:23, Lennart Regebro wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> I prefer "x = '%s%s%s%s' % (a, b, c, d)" when string's number is more > >>> than 3 > >>> and some of them are literal strings. > >> > >> > >> This has the benefit of being slow both on CPython and PyPy. Although > >> using .format() is even slower. :-) > >> > > How about adding a class method for catenation: > > > > str.cat(a, b, c, d) > > str.cat([a, b, c, d]) # Equivalent to "".join([a, b, c, d]) > > > > Each argument could be a string or a list of strings. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Python-Dev mailing list > > Python-Dev@python.org > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > > Unsubscribe: > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fijall%40gmail.com > > I actually wonder. > > There seems to be the consensus to avoid += (to some extent). Can > someone commit the change to urrllib then? I'm talking about reverting > http://bugs.python.org/issue1285086 specifically Please re-open the bug with a comment as to why and I'm sure someone will get to it.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
