On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:33 PM, MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: >> > On 2013-02-13 13:23, Lennart Regebro wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I prefer "x = '%s%s%s%s' % (a, b, c, d)" when string's number is more >> >>> than 3 >> >>> and some of them are literal strings. >> >> >> >> >> >> This has the benefit of being slow both on CPython and PyPy. Although >> >> using .format() is even slower. :-) >> >> >> > How about adding a class method for catenation: >> > >> > str.cat(a, b, c, d) >> > str.cat([a, b, c, d]) # Equivalent to "".join([a, b, c, d]) >> > >> > Each argument could be a string or a list of strings. >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Python-Dev mailing list >> > Python-Dev@python.org >> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> > Unsubscribe: >> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fijall%40gmail.com >> >> I actually wonder. >> >> There seems to be the consensus to avoid += (to some extent). Can >> someone commit the change to urrllib then? I'm talking about reverting >> http://bugs.python.org/issue1285086 specifically > > > Please re-open the bug with a comment as to why and I'm sure someone will > get to it.
I can't re-open the bug, my account is kind of lame (and seriously, why do you guys *do* have multiple layers of bug tracker accounts?) Cheers, fijal _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
