On 5 Mar 2013, at 09:02, Glyph <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Robert Collins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In principle maybe. Need to talk with the trial developers, nose
>> developers, py.test developers etc - to get consensus on a number of
>> internal API friction points.
>
> Some of trial's lessons might be also useful for the stdlib going forward,
> given the hope of doing some event-loop stuff in the core.
>
> But, I feel like this might be too much to cover at the language summit;
> there could be a test frameworks summit of its own, of about equivalent time
> and scope, and we'd still have a lot to discuss.
>
> Is there a unit testing SIG someone from Twisted ought to be a member of, to
> represent Trial, and to get consensus on these points going forward?
The testing-on-python mailing list is probably the best place (and if doesn't
have that status already I'd be keen to elevate it to "official sig for Python
testing issues" status).
http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python
Like the "massively distributed testing" use case, I'd be very happy for the
standard library testing capabilities to better support this use case - but I
wouldn't like to design their apis around that as the sole use case. :-)
Michael
>
> -glyph
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
--
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/
May you do good and not evil
May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others
May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
-- the sqlite blessing
http://www.sqlite.org/different.html
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
