On 5 Mar 2013, at 09:02, Glyph <gl...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: > On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:13 PM, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote: > >> In principle maybe. Need to talk with the trial developers, nose >> developers, py.test developers etc - to get consensus on a number of >> internal API friction points. > > Some of trial's lessons might be also useful for the stdlib going forward, > given the hope of doing some event-loop stuff in the core. > > But, I feel like this might be too much to cover at the language summit; > there could be a test frameworks summit of its own, of about equivalent time > and scope, and we'd still have a lot to discuss. > > Is there a unit testing SIG someone from Twisted ought to be a member of, to > represent Trial, and to get consensus on these points going forward?
The testing-on-python mailing list is probably the best place (and if doesn't have that status already I'd be keen to elevate it to "official sig for Python testing issues" status). http://lists.idyll.org/listinfo/testing-in-python Like the "massively distributed testing" use case, I'd be very happy for the standard library testing capabilities to better support this use case - but I wouldn't like to design their apis around that as the sole use case. :-) Michael > > -glyph > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com