On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11 Apr 2013 07:49, "Antoine Pitrou" <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: >> >> On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:01:46 +0200 (CEST) >> benjamin.peterson <python-check...@python.org> wrote: >> > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/35cb75b9d653 >> > changeset: 83238:35cb75b9d653 >> > branch: 3.3 >> > parent: 83235:172f825d7fc9 >> > user: Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> >> > date: Wed Apr 10 17:00:56 2013 -0400 >> > summary: >> > don't run frame if it has no stack (closes #17669) >> >> Wouldn't it be better with a test? > > Benjamin said much the same thing on the issue, but persuading the > interpreter to create a frame without a stack that then gets exposed to this > code path isn't straightforward :P > > Cheers, > Nick.
Maybe it's worth understanding in which circumstances this holds? Please write a test, we'll run into similar issue at some point Im'm sure. Cheers, fijal _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
