2013/4/11 Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com>: > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 11 Apr 2013 07:49, "Antoine Pitrou" <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 23:01:46 +0200 (CEST) >>> benjamin.peterson <python-check...@python.org> wrote: >>> > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/35cb75b9d653 >>> > changeset: 83238:35cb75b9d653 >>> > branch: 3.3 >>> > parent: 83235:172f825d7fc9 >>> > user: Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> >>> > date: Wed Apr 10 17:00:56 2013 -0400 >>> > summary: >>> > don't run frame if it has no stack (closes #17669) >>> >>> Wouldn't it be better with a test? >> >> Benjamin said much the same thing on the issue, but persuading the >> interpreter to create a frame without a stack that then gets exposed to this >> code path isn't straightforward :P >> >> Cheers, >> Nick. > > Maybe it's worth understanding in which circumstances this holds? > Please write a test, we'll run into similar issue at some point Im'm > sure.
Probably not. It's related to cyclic GC. -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
