-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Am 16.05.2013 17:40, schrieb Barry Warsaw: > We've since found a few cases where Python 3.3 pyc files are > probably corrupted, so that shoots down my theory about a race > condition on reading/writing pyc files, since 3.3 implements > atomic-rename and *should* be immune to that kind of thing. > > It's still a mystery though.
Are you able to reproduce the issue? Perhaps you could use inotify to track down file activity. It shouldn't affect timing much and you can track if more than one process it writing to the same file. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRlQe4AAoJEMeIxMHUVQ1F7K8P/1QoH8/iJP60dHQHfU12AYFY nUu1ztRmwTSx0eYEumwsRF5iUuNse7kFzYM0u02lEmZyuk34hLtBBcnNGA0wJ4mZ SdiXL1ZA2levg9Qlr8cPQqgnlm9aXnIazQKbUJ+/MOGBdTPBemMunMyMSsNg5ENT gLEVb/lufNssAoo+M0QKq9EjE2xSQEsFjUDM575KHbq006EzdHp7on2xQ20pJzLc iq/qWAFh+kjS42Udk9luvAKy3iGJcGXnG9AY0hkLBh8tQYhISWplsBo5wiigZLyv PZ0tbh5h3bsi80FjDlSfVPFOzlt34xI6tPRONUj/XWLPfvBCGzwqjYGc5Z6+CkAF pPAamF0ntwq76mNBl9EABAY1q85SgEU+toft8KQdxm+SHuKINJc95R8x6ypsnYIQ Ol+L5nUy+zV3vCJe9TM2U2cUB/UWHLM0qGTSYowLqTXtv+1Y+J55g63kOLkfCrnF znVXMU5FMotlh6i1rK/uwBttJ+NdjOTL0+eVbVqm39bBA6PU7UgANNNSIWVPCbfu HwucdVwkY932TxiVpWZBSPVLQmjNHIOlVj8uFIkhBnEeWSYkpIu+wV4f+Gc048AP 7EYYMMHTdlodNdKRlr+ksczhJvO67STjKH0a+vB2fro/wjuxwcqD7A0qG0PfvURg 7vofW0fs9lKap0wk9DsT =v709 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
