On Jun 16, 2013, at 1:52 AM, Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> wrote:

> Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> writes:
> 
>> On Jun 15, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
>>> Is there anything I can do to keep the ‘enum’ package online for
>>> continuity but make it clear, to automated tools, that this is
>>> end-of-life and obsoleted by another package?
>> 
>> Right now the best you can do is make a note of it. Pep 426 let's you
>> do what you want.
> 
> Thanks. What specifically in PEP 426 do you mean; how would I make a
> note of “this package is end-of-life as is, please migrate to
> ‘flufl.enum’ instead” using PEP 426 metadata?

http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0426/#obsoleted-by

Note PEP426 isn't completed and isn't implemented :)

> 
> -- 
> \        “There are no significant bugs in our released software that |
>  `\         any significant number of users want fixed.” —Bill Gates, |
> _o__)                                                       1995-10-23 |
> Ben Finney
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: 
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/donald%40stufft.io


-----------------
Donald Stufft
PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to