On Jun 28, 2013, at 02:11 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >I have no idea why it was the other way around in flufl.enum, but >admittedly neither of these rules are absolute, and it's possible that >flufl.enum just evolved that way without conscious decisions, or that >it came from taking a different perspective.
The latter, but I think PEP 435 made the right choices, at least for the stdlib version. It doesn't bother me that I had to switch them when porting. -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
