David Beasley; see earlier in this same thread: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-February/thread.html#124389
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > On 7/13/2013 12:10 AM, Eric Snow wrote: > >> >> On Feb 27, 2013 4:31 AM, "Michael Foord" <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk >> > > > +1 PLY is capable and well tried-and-tested. We used it in Resolver >> One to implement a pretty large grammar and it is (in my opinion) best >> of breed in the Python parser generator world. Being stable and widely >> used, with an "available maintainer", makes it an ideal candidate for >> standard library inclusion. >> >> Is this still on the table? >> > > Who is the maintainer and what is his opinion? > > -- > Terry Jan Reedy > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/**mailman/listinfo/python-dev<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev> > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/**mailman/options/python-dev/** > jdunck%40gmail.com<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jdunck%40gmail.com> >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
