On 15 July 2013 16:01, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jul 14, 2013, at 6:32 AM, David Beazley <d...@dabeaz.com> wrote: > > I honestly don't have any particular thoughts about PLY vs. other parser > generators and the merits of their inclusion (or not) in the standard > library. > > > I would love to have PLY in the standard library. > It would open up a whole new world to some users > and be the basis for tool generation for others.
Agreed (and the fact it's a prerequisite for pycparsing and cffi just seals the deal). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
