On 13 Aug 2013 19:40, "Victor Stinner" <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Send the patch somewhere (ex: attach it to an email, or to the bug > tracker, as you want), or give the error message, if you want some > help. > > > Ask for a pronouncement on the PEP first, and then fix the test breakage later? > > Sometimes, it's possible to pronounce on a PEP without a working > implementation. But it's easier to pronounce with a working > implementation :-)
It's more typical for reference implementations to be "proof of concept" quality code, though. It's very rare to have a full, ready to apply patch (although we certainly don't complain if that happens!) (To directly answer the original question: a test integration glitch isn't a blocker for PEP acceptance, just for actually committing the implementation) Cheers, Nick. > > Victor > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
