On 09/09/13 22:25, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2013/9/9 Mark Shannon <m...@hotpy.org>:
On 09/09/13 15:30, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 07/30/2013 11:17 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
And something I forgot to ask: is anyone willing to be the
BDFL-Delegate for
PEP 447?
*Bump*.
It would be nice if this could make into 3.4.
IMO, there are some issues that need to be addressed before PEP 447 should
be accepted.
1. Is there even a problem at all, or is this just a bug in super?
Why doesn't super() respect the __getattribute__ method of the superclass?
You want to be looking things up on the class, not an instance.
Sorry, I meant 'type of the superclass' rather than 'superclass'.
I was suggesting that super().m should be
type(type(self).__mro__[1]).__getattribute__('m')
rather than type(self).__mro__[1].__dict__['m']
(ignoring descriptor __get__ calls)
Unfortunately this brings its own problems, due to __getattribute__
doing its own traversal of the mro.
So, scratch point 1.
Cheers,
Mark.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
