On 24 September 2013 17:25, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Preferring the status quo because > you're holding out a forlorn hope for a concise wording that explains: > > - there are places where exceptions may occur but the interpreter > can't reraise them > - this is one of those cases, so we're printing it to stderr instead > > *without users needing to do any research*.
Oops, reworded the second part of that sentence without fixing the first part. It should have said: ============== It doesn't make sense to prefer the status quo because you're holding out a forlorn hope for a concise wording that explains: - there are places where exceptions may occur but the interpreter can't reraise them - this is one of those cases, so we're printing it to stderr instead *without users needing to do any research*. ============== Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
