> On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:59 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It sounds like a reasonable approach to me. > > In terms of naming, would you consider "concurrent.asyncio"? When we created > that parent namespace for futures, one of the other suggested submodules > discussed was the standard event loop API. > +1 but up to guido
> Cheers, > Nick. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jnoller%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
