On 27 October 2013 01:10, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote: > 26.10.13 15:50, Stefan Krah написав(ла): > >> nick.coghlan <python-check...@python.org> wrote: >>> >>> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a9bbc2d0c1dc >>> -HAVE_DOCSTRINGS = (check_impl_detail(cpython=False) or >>> - sys.platform == 'win32' or >>> - sysconfig.get_config_var('WITH_DOC_STRINGS')) >>> +# Rather than trying to enumerate all the cases where docstrings may be >>> +# disabled, we just check for that directly >>> + >>> +def _check_docstrings(): >>> + """Just used to check if docstrings are enabled""" >>> + >>> +HAVE_DOCSTRINGS = (_check_docstrings.__doc__ is not None) >>> >>> requires_docstrings = unittest.skipUnless(HAVE_DOCSTRINGS, >> >> >> I think that does not detect --without-doc-strings (i.e. the C docstrings >> are >> empty). > > > Indeed. HAVE_DOCSTRINGS was introduced to skip tests for the C docstrings. > Python docstrings tests are skipped if sys.flags.optimize >= 2.
That's *extraordinarily* confusing, especially when Serhiy suggested I use the flag when testing a pure Python module. Regards, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
