26.10.13 20:32, Nick Coghlan написав(ла):
On 27 October 2013 01:10, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote:
26.10.13 15:50, Stefan Krah написав(ла):
nick.coghlan <python-check...@python.org> wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/a9bbc2d0c1dc
-HAVE_DOCSTRINGS = (check_impl_detail(cpython=False) or
- sys.platform == 'win32' or
- sysconfig.get_config_var('WITH_DOC_STRINGS'))
+# Rather than trying to enumerate all the cases where docstrings may be
+# disabled, we just check for that directly
+
+def _check_docstrings():
+ """Just used to check if docstrings are enabled"""
+
+HAVE_DOCSTRINGS = (_check_docstrings.__doc__ is not None)
requires_docstrings = unittest.skipUnless(HAVE_DOCSTRINGS,
I think that does not detect --without-doc-strings (i.e. the C docstrings
are
empty).
Indeed. HAVE_DOCSTRINGS was introduced to skip tests for the C docstrings.
Python docstrings tests are skipped if sys.flags.optimize >= 2.
That's *extraordinarily* confusing, especially when Serhiy suggested I
use the flag when testing a pure Python module.
I'm sorry for misleading you.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
