On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 01:12:03 -0600, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> wrote: > If I had to choose right now, a safe choice would be to focus on > the primary use case and implement a clean CaseInsensitiveDict > without the double-dict first-saved case-preserving feature. > That said, I find the TD to be fascinating and there's more work > to do before making a decision.
Please be aware that the PEP author's motivation in submitting the PEP was to have a case insensitive, case *preserving* dict. The generalization serves to make the new datatype more useful, but if the end result doesn't satisfy the original use case of the author, I won't be surprised if he has no motivation to work on it further :). --David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
