On Mon, 18 Nov 2013 07:48:27 -0800 Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > 18.11.13 07:53, Tim Peters написав(ла): > > > > - Some easy sanity checking due to the tiny redundancy (if the byte > >> immediately following the current frame is not a FRAME opcode, the > >> pickle is corrupt; and also corrupt if a FRAME opcode is encountered > >> _inside_ the current frame). > >> > > > > For efficient unpickling a FRAME opcode followed by 8-byte count should be > > *last* thing in a frame (unless it is a last frame). > > > > I don't understand that. > > Clearly the framing is the weakest point of the PEP (== elicits the most > bikeshedding). I am also unsure about the value of framing when pickles are > written to strings.
It hasn't much value in that case, but the cost is also small (8 bytes every 64KB, roughly). Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
