Hi, With Victor's consent, I overhauled PEP 460 and made the feature set more restricted and consistent with the bytes/str separation. However, I also added bytearray into the mix, as bytearray objects should generally support the same operations as bytes (and they can be useful *especially* for network programming).
Regards Antoine. On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:24:50 +0100 Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > bytes % args and bytes.format(args) are requested by Mercurial and > Twisted projects. The issue #3982 was stuck because nobody proposed a > complete definition of the "new" features. Here is a try as a PEP. > > The PEP is a draft with open questions. First, I'm not sure that both > bytes%args and bytes.format(args) are needed. The implementation of > .format() is more complex, so why not only adding bytes%args? Then, > the following points must be decided to define the complete list of > supported features (formatters): _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
