On 27/01/2014 01:52, Nick Coghlan wrote:

In 3.5, that will be passing None, rather than -1. For those proposing
to change the maintenance releases, how should a user relying on this
misbehaviour update their code to handle it?


I'm -1 on using None. The code currently rejects anything except an int. The docs don't say anything about using None, except in the "equivalent to" section, which is also the only place where it looks as if times can be a keyword argument.

--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to