On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:06:57PM -0800, Larry Hastings wrote: > If I were writing it, it might well come out like this: [snip example]
+1 on this wording, with one minor caveat: > .. note: if "times" is specified using a keyword argument, and > provided with a negative value, repeat yields the object forever. > This is a bug, its use is unsupported, and this behavior may be > removed in a future version of Python. How about changing "may be removed" to "will be removed", he asks hopefully? :-) -- Steven _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
