On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:01:02 -0800 Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote: > > On 01/27/2014 01:39 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:01:08 -0800 > > Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote: > >> On 01/26/2014 08:40 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > >>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Vajrasky Kok > >>> <sky....@speaklikeaking.com <mailto:sky....@speaklikeaking.com>> wrote: > >>> > >>> In case we are taking "not backporting anything at all" road, what is > >>> the best fix for the document? > >>> > >>> > >>> I would say no fix is needed for this doc because the signature > >>> suggests (correctly) that passing times by keyword is not supported. > >> Where does it do that? > > In the "[,times]" spelling, which is the spelling customarily used for > > positional-only arguments. > > That's not my experience.
But it's mine :-) (try "help(str)" or "help(list)") That said, it's fair to say that whatever convention there is isn't very strictly followed on this particular point. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
