Am 27.01.2014 13:12, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 04:01:02 -0800 > Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote: >> >> On 01/27/2014 01:39 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >> > On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:01:08 -0800 >> > Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote: >> >> On 01/26/2014 08:40 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Vajrasky Kok >> >>> <sky....@speaklikeaking.com <mailto:sky....@speaklikeaking.com>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> In case we are taking "not backporting anything at all" road, what >> >>> is >> >>> the best fix for the document? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> I would say no fix is needed for this doc because the signature >> >>> suggests (correctly) that passing times by keyword is not supported. >> >> Where does it do that? >> > In the "[,times]" spelling, which is the spelling customarily used for >> > positional-only arguments. >> >> That's not my experience. > > But it's mine :-) (try "help(str)" or "help(list)")
It's also the convention we've been using for the docs. Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
