On Feb 03, 2014, at 06:43 AM, Larry Hastings wrote: >But that only fixes part of the problem. Our theoretical extension that >wants to be binary-compatible with 3.3 and 3.4 still has a problem: how can >they support signatures? They can't give PyMethodDefEx structures to 3.3, it >will blow up. But if they don't use PyMethodDefEx, they can't have >signatures.
Can't an extension writer #ifdef around this? Yeah, it's ugly, but it's a pretty standard approach for making C extensions multi-version compatible. -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
