On 02/03/2014 08:05 AM, Stefan Krah wrote:
I think we may slowly get into PEP territory here. Just imagine that
we settle on X, then decide at a later point to have a standard way of
adding type annotations, then find that X does not work because of (unknown).
I'm mentioning this because signatures get really interesting for me
if they contain type information.
I simultaneously share your interest, and also suspect that maybe Python
is the wrong language for that. After all, Python has always been about
duck-typing.
Even if it did happen, it won't be for quite a while yet. The logical
mechanism for type information in pure Python is annotations, and afaik
they're not getting any large-scale real-world use for type annotating.
(If I'm misinformed I'd love to hear counterexamples.)
//arry/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
