I don't think so. asyncio depends on selectors but not vice versa. The selectors module was not part of PEP 3156. It is solid and I don't see any reason why it should get a reprieve from the usual strict backwards compatibility standards.
--Guido On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Eli Bendersky <eli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Giampaolo Rodola' <g.rod...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 9:25 PM, R. David Murray >> <rdmur...@bitdance.com>wrote: >> >>> Not Provisional: >>> >>> selectors >>> >> >> Wouldn't it be wiser to consider this one provisional as well? >> > > +1 because of the intimate ties to asyncio > > Eli > > > >> >> >> > >> -- >> Giampaolo - http://grodola.blogspot.com >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> Unsubscribe: >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/eliben%40gmail.com >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
