On Mon, 17 Mar 2014 11:44:28 -0400 Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote: > > Shouldn't we at least do a review of the open issues against 3.3 first, > particularly those with patches? E.g. "critcal" / "patch review": > > http://bugs.python.org/issue?%40search_text=&ignore=file%3Acontent&title=&%40columns=title&id=&%40columns=id&stage=4&creation=&creator=&activity=&%40columns=activity&%40sort=activity&actor=&nosy=&type=&components=&versions=17&dependencies=&assignee=&keywords=&priority=2&%40group=priority&status=1&%40columns=status&resolution=&nosy_count=&message_count=&%40pagesize=50&%40startwith=0&%40action=search
Looking at those, they are nice to fix, but not particularly critical (and indeed they have been open for quite some time). > or "high" / "patch review": > > http://bugs.python.org/issue?%40search_text=&ignore=file%3Acontent&title=&%40columns=title&id=&%40columns=id&stage=4&creation=&creator=&activity=&%40columns=activity&%40sort=activity&actor=&nosy=&type=&components=&versions=17&dependencies=&assignee=&keywords=&priority=3&%40group=priority&status=1&%40columns=status&resolution=&nosy_count=&message_count=&%40pagesize=50&%40startwith=0&%40action=search Ditto here. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
