On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 19:44:42 -0400 "R. David Murray" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:43:14 +0100, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 20:47:28 +0100 (CET) > > r.david.murray <[email protected]> wrote: > > > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ec556e45641a > > > changeset: 89936:ec556e45641a > > > user: R David Murray <[email protected]> > > > date: Sun Mar 23 15:08:43 2014 -0400 > > > summary: > > > #20145: assert[Raises|Warns]Regex now raise TypeError on bad regex. > > > > > > Previously a non-string, non-regex second argument could cause the test > > > to always pass. > > > > It seems like this would be useful to fix in 3.4 too. > > You will note that the change got a porting note in What's New. It will > only break tests (that are currently no-ops), not code, so I'd be fine > with backporting it, but the original issue did not call for that. Exposing buggy tests sounds like a good thing to me :-) > If we fix it in 3.4, should we fix it in 2.7 as well? If the *Regex methods are there, yes, IMO. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
