On 27 March 2014 08:16, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> wrote: > And random pieces of C included in the standard library can be > shuffled under the carpet under the disguise of upgrade or what are > you suggesting?
The sort of thing that happens is that the relevant approvers will accept python-dev as a "trusted supplier" and then Python upgrades are acceptable subject to review of the changes, etc. For a new module, there is a whole other level of questions around how do we trust the person who developed the code, do we need to do a full code review, etc? It's a bit unfair to describe the process as "random pieces of C" being "shuffled under the carpet". (Although there probably are environments where that is uncomfortably close to the truth :-() Paul _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
