On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 March 2014 08:16, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> wrote: >> And random pieces of C included in the standard library can be >> shuffled under the carpet under the disguise of upgrade or what are >> you suggesting? > > The sort of thing that happens is that the relevant approvers will > accept python-dev as a "trusted supplier" and then Python upgrades are > acceptable subject to review of the changes, etc. For a new module, > there is a whole other level of questions around how do we trust the > person who developed the code, do we need to do a full code review, > etc? > > It's a bit unfair to describe the process as "random pieces of C" > being "shuffled under the carpet". (Although there probably are > environments where that is uncomfortably close to the truth :-() > > Paul
I just find "my company is stupid so let's work around it by putting stuff to python standard library" unacceptable argument for python-dev and all the python community. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
