On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 18:47:59 +0000 Brett Cannon <bcan...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu Mar 27 2014 at 2:42:40 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > > > Much better, but I'm still not happy with including %s at all. Otherwise > > it's accept-worthy. (How's that for pressure. :-) > > > > But if we only add %b and leave out %s then how is this going to lead to > Python 2/3 compatible code since %b is not in Python 2? Or am I > misunderstanding you?
I think we have reached a point where adding porting-related facilities in 3.5 may actually slow down the pace of porting, rather than accelerate it (because people will then wait for 3.5 to start porting stuff). Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
