On 2014-03-28 16:39, Paul Moore wrote:
On 28 March 2014 16:22, Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com> wrote:
On 03/28/2014 12:18 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
I'm mostly arguing the FLOSS project should feel free to ignore
high-maintenance-cost commercial concerns until those concerns bring
either blook (funded developer time) or treasure (pooled to pay for
the same time) to the table to pay for them.
Dangit,
s/blook/blood/
Rats. I thought I'd just learned a new word. Regardless of reality, I
think "blook" should be a real word :-)
Yes, and it should mean "funded developer time on or for an open source
project".
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
