-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/29/2014 03:46 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> I really don't think commercial profit as the motive for a request, > or ability to pay, should be an important reason to *ignore* user > wants. We've already got corrosion on the terminals the leaky batteries-included stdlib (ssl, anyone?). I see nothing wrong with rejecting additional batteries proposed purely FBO organizations who have the kind of policies you describe, but don't contribute blood-or-treasure toward their maintenannce (*especially* because they are in the "enterprise" space, and could be expected to pay for that kind of support). This kind of "Python-in-a-tie" discussion is probably moot for any version of Python that python-dev actually cares about, BTW: by the time such organizations get around to using 3.5, it likely won't even be getting security releases from the core developers. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlM3Q2wACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ7Y5QCdGhrpenkXJnRXoseVabQDwJHX 0zcAn0tAf6iHT276oxjZS/ZhPu49wF8M =6Gci -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
