On Sun, Apr 6, 2014, at 18:41, Nathaniel Smith wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just finished updating PEP 465 with resolutions to the various > issues that were raised during the python-ideas thread about it. (The > main changes since that thread are that @@ has been removed, and we > now definitely propose that @ have the same precedence and > associativity as *.) > > I believe this leaves only one open question, which is where exactly > to stick the new matmul slots into PyTypeObject. This is the kind of > fiddly detail that can easily be settled later if the PEP is accepted, > though.
I don't see what it shouldn't be in PyNumberMethods. Surely, we're not going to get a flood of requests for more matrix operators, are we? :) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
