On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org>wrote:
> > I believe this leaves only one open question, which is where exactly > > to stick the new matmul slots into PyTypeObject. This is the kind of > > fiddly detail that can easily be settled later if the PEP is accepted, > > though. > > I don't see what it shouldn't be in PyNumberMethods. Surely, we're not > going to get a flood of requests for more matrix operators, are we? :) We may want to introduce say PyArrayMethods even if we don't introduce more array operators. We can populate that struct with array-specific alternatives for PySequence/PyMappingMethods and eliminate the need for dynamically created array types to allocate those. There is also a way to introduce PyArrayMethods at no cost to current implementation: we can rename tp_reserved (formerly known as tp_compare) to tp_as_array.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
