That sounds reasonable to me -- at this point I don't expect this to make it into 3.4.2; Nick has some working code on the ticket: http://bugs.python.org/issue22417 it's mostly missing documentation.
Alex On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > Nice. I just realized the release candidate for 3.4.2 is really close (RC1 > Monday, final Oct 6, see PEP 429). What's your schedule for 3.4? I see no > date for 2.7.9 yet (but that could just be that PEP 373 hasn't been > updated). What about the Apple and Microsoft issues Christian pointed out? > > Regarding the approval process, I want to get this into 2.7 and 3.4, but I > want it done right, and I'm not convinced that the implementation is > sufficiently worked out. I don't want you to feel rushed, and I don't want > you to feel that you can't start coding until the PEP is approved, but I > also feel that I want to see more working code and some beta testing before > it goes live. Perhaps I should just approve the PEP but separately get to > approve the code? (Others will have to review it for correctness -- but I > want to understand and review the API.) > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Alex Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Done and done. >> >> Alex >> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 on Nick's suggestion. (Might also mention that this is the reason why >>> both functions should exist and have compatible signatures.) >>> >>> Also please, please, please add explicit mention of Python 2.7, 3.4 and >>> 3.5 in the Abstract (for example in the 3rd paragraph of the abstract). >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 20 September 2014 08:34, Alex Gaynor <alex.gay...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > Pushed a new version which I believe adresses all of these. I added an >>>> > example of opting-out with urllib.urlopen, let me know if there's any >>>> other >>>> > APIs you think I should show an example with. >>>> >>>> It would be worth explicitly stating the process global monkeypatching >>>> hack: >>>> >>>> import ssl >>>> ssl._create_default_https_context = ssl._create_unverified_context >>>> >>>> Adding that hack to sitecustomize allows corporate sysadmins that can >>>> update their standard operating environment more easily than they can >>>> fix invalid certificate infrastructure to work around the problem on >>>> behalf of their users. It also helps out users that will be able to >>>> deal with such broken infrastructure without updating each and every >>>> one of their scripts. >>>> >>>> It's deliberately ugly because it's a genuinely bad idea that folks >>>> should want to avoid using, but as a matter of practical reality, >>>> corporate IT departments are chronically understaffed, and often fully >>>> committed to fighting the crisis du jour, without sufficient time >>>> being available for regular infrastructure maintenance tasks. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Nick. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right >> to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) >> "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero >> GPG Key fingerprint: 125F 5C67 DFE9 4084 >> > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) > -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero GPG Key fingerprint: 125F 5C67 DFE9 4084
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
