> On Nov 30, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 29 November 2014 at 23:27, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote: >> In previous years there was concern about how well supported git was on >> Windows >> in comparison to Mercurial. However git has grown to support Windows as a >> first >> class citizen. In addition to that, for Windows users who are not well >> aquanted >> with the Windows command line there are GUI options as well. > > I have little opinion on the PEP as a whole, but is the above > statement true? From the git website, version 2.2.0 is current, and > yet the downloadable Windows version is still 1.9.4. That's a fairly > significant version lag for a "first class citizen". > > I like git, and it has a number of windows-specific extensions that > are really useful (more than Mercurial, AFAIK), but I wouldn't say > that the core product supported Windows on an equal footing to Linux. > > Paul
I think so yes. I may be wrong, however while 1.9.4 may be the latest downloadable version of git for Windows, there is no downloadable version of the Linux clients at all, they just tell you to go use your package manager which for instance is version 1.7 on Debian. On OS X the latest version is 2.0.1. --- Donald Stufft PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
