On 11 Feb 2015 03:47, "Steve Dower" <steve.do...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > This is yet another attempt to try and change user behaviour, which I'm not thrilled about, but I'm really starting to feel that this is the best way out of a bad situation. It differs from the solutions used on Linux, though there may be some value in this approach there too. Thought/votes/suggestions?
I don't think we have this problem solved on Linux either, we just have a variety of workarounds in place of varying degrees of clunkiness :) The thing I find attractive about this specific proposal is that we could potentially expand it to Linux as well through appropriate use of environment modules, and I expect that would also cover other POSIX systems. So if you wanted to draft up an initial PEP with a concrete proposal covering Windows systems, I'd be happy to tackle the task of getting the same design to work on Linux (and hopefully POSIX in general) using environment modules. Cheers, Nick. > > Cheers, > Steve > > > [1]: Actually multiple scripts to handle cmd.exe/PowerShell, but this is an implementation detail. Users would simply type `activate-py` and the shells know which one to use. > > [2]: We can easily add Start Menu shortcuts (e.g. "Python 3.5 (32-bit) Command Prompt") and run it for them, though that is not a critical part of this proposal. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com