But isn't that also a problem? It would make the existence of that member a bit unpredictable.
On Saturday, May 23, 2015, Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote: > > > On 05/23/2015 09:46 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > How will __definition_order__ be set in the case where __prepare__ doesn't > return an OrderedDict? Or where a custom metaclass's __new__ calls its > superclass's __new__ with a plain dict? (I just wrote some code that does > that. :-) > > > In his patch, type_new tests to see if the dict passed in is an ordered > dict (PyODict_Check). __definition_order__ is only created and populated > if it passes the test. > > http://bugs.python.org/file39446/odict-class-definition-namespace.diff > > > */arry* > -- --Guido van Rossum (on iPad)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
