On 26 May 2015 05:41, "Eric Snow" <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Regardless, I know there were a few folks (e.g. Yury) that wanted to > see C OrderedDict in 3.5 and there may be others that would really > like OrderedDict-by-default in 3.5 (Nick?).
I think it's the combination with PEP 487 that makes OrderedDict-by-default genuinely compelling, so I don't mind if the application to class namespaces slips to 3.6 (and perhaps even becomes part of that PEP). For the feature freeze exception for the C odict implementation itself, I think I'm morally obliged to back that given my highly debatable decision to check in the PEP 489 implementation even though we hadn't worked out all the kinks in module unloading yet (Petr subsequently got all of the refleaks in the machinery itself sorted out before the beta, including a previously undetected one in PyType_FromSpecAndBases, but there's still a leak when unloading the new multi-phase initialisation test module). Regards, Nick.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
