Shouldn't at least ayncio doc https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/asyncio.html be updated accordingly ? for example https://docs.python.org/3.5/search.html?q=await&check_keywords=yes&area=default doesn't mention https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/asyncio.html
2015-08-02 16:21 GMT+02:00 Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com>: > Nikolaus, > > Strange. PEP 492 changes are fully documented since b3. > > Here are just few examples: > > > https://docs.python.org/3.5/whatsnew/3.5.html#pep-492-coroutines-with-async-and-await-syntax > https://docs.python.org/3.5/reference/datamodel.html#coroutines > https://docs.python.org/3.5/reference/compound_stmts.html#coroutines > > Perhaps, it's a browser cache issue? > > Yury > > On 2015-08-02 12:38 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Looking at the language reference for 3.5.0b4, I noticed that it >> mentions neither async nor await. >> >> Is this still going to get updated, or will the only documentation >> consist of the PEP itself? I think having a Python release recognize >> keywords that are not mentioned in the language reference would be quite >> unfortunate (even if they're treated specially to preserve backwards >> compatibility). >> >> Best, >> -Nikolaus >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/xavier.combelle%40gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
