Hi, No, not a browser cache issue. I was looking for "async" or "await" in the table of contents, so I didn't notice the new "coroutines" sections.
Sorry for the noise. -Nikolaus On Aug 02 2015, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nikolaus, > > Strange. PEP 492 changes are fully documented since b3. > > Here are just few examples: > > https://docs.python.org/3.5/whatsnew/3.5.html#pep-492-coroutines-with-async-and-await-syntax > https://docs.python.org/3.5/reference/datamodel.html#coroutines > https://docs.python.org/3.5/reference/compound_stmts.html#coroutines > > Perhaps, it's a browser cache issue? > > Yury > > On 2015-08-02 12:38 AM, Nikolaus Rath wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Looking at the language reference for 3.5.0b4, I noticed that it >> mentions neither async nor await. >> >> Is this still going to get updated, or will the only documentation >> consist of the PEP itself? I think having a Python release recognize >> keywords that are not mentioned in the language reference would be quite >> unfortunate (even if they're treated specially to preserve backwards >> compatibility). >> >> Best, >> -Nikolaus >> > -- GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.« _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
