On Aug 11, 2015 10:19 AM, "Wes Turner" <wes.tur...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 11, 2015 10:10 AM, "Alexander Walters" <tritium-l...@sdamon.com> wrote: > > > > This may seam like a simplistic solution to i18n, but why not just add a method to string objects (assuming we implement f-strings) that just returns the original, unprocessed string. If the string was not an f-string, it just returns self. The gettext module can be modified, I think trivially, to use the method instead of the string directly. > > > > Is this a horrible idea?
- [ ] review all string interpolation (for "injection") * [ ] review every '%' * [ ] review every ".format()" * [ ] review every f-string (AND LOCALS AND GLOBALS) * every os.system, os.exec*, subprocess.Popen * every unclosed tag * every unescaped control character This would create work we don't need. Solution: __str_shell_ escapes, adds slashes, and quotes. __str__SQL__ refs a global list of reserved words. > > This is a backward compatible macro to elide code in strings that should not be. > > * IIUC, this would only be usable in 3.6+ (so, not at all and style guide says NO) > * there should be a normal functional() way to accomplish this in a backwards compatible way > * formatlng() / lookup() would be more future compatible > > > > > - Alex W. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Python-Dev mailing list > > Python-Dev@python.org > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/wes.turner%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
