On 8/11/2015 11:28, Wes Turner wrote:
On Aug 11, 2015 10:19 AM, "Wes Turner" <wes.tur...@gmail.com
<mailto:wes.tur...@gmail.com>> wrote:
- [ ] review all string interpolation (for "injection")
* [ ] review every '%'
* [ ] review every ".format()"
* [ ] review every f-string (AND LOCALS AND GLOBALS)
* every os.system, os.exec*, subprocess.Popen
* every unclosed tag
* every unescaped control character
This would create work we don't need.
Solution: __str_shell_ escapes, adds slashes, and quotes. __str__SQL__
refs a global list of reserved words.
I don't understand why % and .format got interjected into this.
If you are mentioning them as 'get the unprocessed version of any string
formatting', that is a bad idea, and not needed, since you already have
an unprocessed string object. Assuming the method were named
"hypothetical":
>>> 'foo bar'.hypothetical() # returns 'foo bar'
>>> '{0} bar'.format('foo').hypothetical() # returns 'foo bar'
>>> ('%s bar' % ('foo',)).hypothetical() # returns 'foo bar'
>>> f'{foo} bar'.hypothetical() # returns '{foo} bar', prime for
translation.
could gettext not be modified to create the same AST as f'{foo} bar'
when it is translated to '{foo} le bar.' and inject it back into the
runtime?
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
