On 08/28/2015 08:44 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 at 08:35 Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com
<mailto:yselivanov...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Unfortunately, separating it from the standard library is something
that I don't think we can do so late in the 3.5 release candidates
process.
Ultimately it's Larry's call, but I don't see why we couldn't. If we
were talking about something as low-level as the urllib package then I
would agree, but beyond its own tests is there anything in the stdlib
that depends on asyncio?
I'm flexible here. My concern is shipping high-quality software.
Removing an entire package outright, even at such a late date, is pretty
low-risk. But before I'd allow it, you'd have to get a BDFL
pronouncement (or BDFL-delegate pronouncement).
//arry/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
