On 1/20/2016 12:45 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:


On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 at 19:33 Martin Panter <vadmium...@gmail.com
<mailto:vadmium%2...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On 19 January 2016 at 20:12, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org
    <mailto:br...@python.org>> wrote:
     > Here is a proposed update:
     >
     > diff -r 633f51d10a67 pep-0007.txt
     > --- a/pep-0007.txt Mon Jan 18 10:52:57 2016 -0800
     > +++ b/pep-0007.txt Tue Jan 19 12:11:44 2016 -0800
     > @@ -75,9 +75,9 @@
     >        }
     >
     >  * Code structure: one space between keywords like ``if``,
    ``for`` and
     > -  the following left paren; no spaces inside the paren; braces
    may be
     > -  omitted where C permits but when present, they should be formatted
     > -  as shown::
     > +  the following left paren; no spaces inside the paren; braces are
     > +  strongly preferred but may be omitted where C permits, and they
     > +  should be formatted as shown::
     >
     >        if (mro != NULL) {
     >            ...

    This change seems to be accidentally smuggled in, in the guise of a
    PEP 512 update :)


Darn, sorry about that; forgot I had that change sitting in my peps
checkout. I'll revert it when I get home (unless the change is actually
acceptable to Guido).

I thought that the above was your intentional compromise change given the range of opinions ;-).

--
Terry Jan Reedy

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to