On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 14:31 Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote:
> The wording is totally fine! You might still want to revert it and > re-commit it so it doesn't look like a mistake when reviewing the log. > Sure thing! > > BTW When can we start using git for the peps repo? > Depends on how fast the parts covered in https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0512/#requirements-for-code-only-repositories and https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0512/#requirements-for-web-related-repositories takes. My hope is before PyCon US (although if we choose to not enforce the CLA on PEP contributions then it could happen even faster). -Brett > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 10:45 Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: >> >>> On 1/20/2016 12:45 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 at 19:33 Martin Panter <vadmium...@gmail.com >>> > <mailto:vadmium%2...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> > >>> > On 19 January 2016 at 20:12, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org >>> > <mailto:br...@python.org>> wrote: >>> > > Here is a proposed update: >>> > > >>> > > diff -r 633f51d10a67 pep-0007.txt >>> > > --- a/pep-0007.txt Mon Jan 18 10:52:57 2016 -0800 >>> > > +++ b/pep-0007.txt Tue Jan 19 12:11:44 2016 -0800 >>> > > @@ -75,9 +75,9 @@ >>> > > } >>> > > >>> > > * Code structure: one space between keywords like ``if``, >>> > ``for`` and >>> > > - the following left paren; no spaces inside the paren; braces >>> > may be >>> > > - omitted where C permits but when present, they should be >>> formatted >>> > > - as shown:: >>> > > + the following left paren; no spaces inside the paren; braces >>> are >>> > > + strongly preferred but may be omitted where C permits, and >>> they >>> > > + should be formatted as shown:: >>> > > >>> > > if (mro != NULL) { >>> > > ... >>> > >>> > This change seems to be accidentally smuggled in, in the guise of a >>> > PEP 512 update :) >>> > >>> > >>> > Darn, sorry about that; forgot I had that change sitting in my peps >>> > checkout. I'll revert it when I get home (unless the change is actually >>> > acceptable to Guido). >>> >>> I thought that the above was your intentional compromise change given >>> the range of opinions ;-). >>> >> >> It is, but Guido is the author of PEP 7 and so I didn't want to check in >> the change without his approval first. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> > Unsubscribe: >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org >> >> > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
