On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 5:03 AM, Chris Barker <chris.bar...@noaa.gov> > wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Koos Zevenhoven <k7ho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > __pathstr__ # pathstring > >> > > >> > >> Or perhaps __pathstring__ in case it may be or return byte strings. > > > > > > I'm fine with __pathstring__ , but I thought it was already decided that > it > > would NOT return a bytestring! > > I sincerely hope that's been settled on. There's no reason to have > this ever return anything other than a str. (Famous last words, I > know.) > > ChrisA > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/g.rodola%40gmail.com > I'm kind of scared about this: scared to state and be 100% sure that bytes won't *never ever* be returned. As such I would call this __fspath__ or something, but I would definitively avoid to use "str". -- Giampaolo - http://grodola.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
